Flight
testing your homebuilt
For
many of us, the day when we've run out of rivets, airplane parts, and
places to drill into our thumbs, is the day it's time to get the RV
in the air. But it's more than just firing up and going. It requires
a methodical and executed flight test regimen.
Fortunately, as
with all things RV, others have gone before, and they've left a trail
of helpful advice, all easily obtained online. Most roads lead to an
EAA article, originally published in 1997 called "Flight
Test Like a Pro," (membership required). Writer Ben Owen strongly
recommends you pick up a copy of the FAA's Amateur-Built
Aircraft Test Flying Handbook from the FAA (pdf).
You've completed
the plane, the paperwork, chosen your test pilot, and read the circular,
but what about RVs? What specifically should you be doing? Enter Michael
Stewart, an RV-8 builder and developer of one of the more impressive
RV construction sites o the Web. He has provided an incredibly extensive
series of flight test cards (pdf) for his RV-8; 69
pages of flight-data testing procedures that's he made available
on his Web site.
In the 21 Years
of RVator (which is a higher number now, I believe), only 3 pages are
dedicated to flight testing. There are, of course, more in the Van's
manual. But the bible of flight testing resources has, for some time,
been Kevin Horton's RV-8 project Web site, where he has several
pages of in-depth preparation and execution of a flight test program.
He also has an extensive
collection of links, although several are broken (I think there
was a server switch somewhere along the line).
And please remember
this (courtesy
of a Falco newsletter): flight testing is a dangerous activity.
"On a first flight, you have to assume that the worst will happen.
The airplane will be badly out of rig, the cockpit will fill with smoke
from an electrical fire and the engine will quit. You need a pilot at
the controls who can calmly put the airplane back on the runway. In
short, you need the best pilot you can get your hands on, and if that
pilot isn't you, then you are letting your ego and emotion do your thinking,
not your brain," it said.
Related links:
Flight
testing homebuilt aircraft (Amazon)
EAA
Chapter 403 April newsletter: Proficiency and currency.
Thread:
First flight runway length (VAF)
Simple Digital
Systems' EM-4: Flight testing
Randolph makes
emergency landing
Bill
Randolph, 77, left the Watsonville Municipal Airport for a leisurely
flight that ended with a 75-yard skid down a field about 5 miles from
the Salinas Municipal Airport. Randolph was unhurt, but the RV-8 airplane
he built from a kit for his globe-circling adventure — the plane
he called "my buddy" — suffered what may be serious
damage.(Santa
Cruz Sentinel)
From the archive: EAA
119 chronicle of Randolph's around-the-world-flight
Van asks: "Why?"
One
of these days, one of the forums at Oshkosh is going to be "Van
vs. the people living on the edge." You just know there's an honest-to-goodness
rant on what some people are doing to his RVs. In the latest RVator,
we got pretty close to hearing it. Specifically, gross weight over Van's
recommendations. In alluding to homebuilding being a "maturing
industry." He said "some of the builder alterations' (mentioned
earlier in the article) seem to contradict my maturity model. To us
at Van's, particularly the engineers, this is so illogical and potentially
dangerous that we are hereby soliciting answers to find out WHY? Off
the record and anonymous. Please, we'd really like to know your reasoning
for penciling in higher gross weights.
1. You feel that the airframe has sufficient structural and aerodynamic
margins to permit this liberty?
2. You feel that your superior piloting skills will overcome the lowered
safety margins caused by the higher gross weight?
3. You like to 'live on the wild side?'
4. You just simply are in a better position to set limits than Van's
engineers?
5. Other?
Answers may be e-mailed to engineering@vansaircraft.com.
Curiously, up to
now, there hasn't been a single word of chatter on any of the
forums or bulletin boards about this article.
Tribute
to Ron Russell
From
Trish Russell via the SoCal RV List: "EAA posted
a nice tribute to my brother, Ron.
You will notice the SoCal group is represented by Lucky Laird's
beautiful RV-6. Thank you again for all your thoughts
and prayers! We attended Mark's mother's funeral today. Maybe
now we can get back to a less dramatic life. I am continuing
to work with the NTSB and the insurance company with the hopes
that we figure out the mystery as to why the engine stopped.
They are coordinating a Lycoming and an ignition expert's inspection
of the plane. The engine was a Superior make engine designed
like a Lycoming.
Palmetto RV fly-in
The
Vans Air Force Palmetto (SC) wing has grown by leaps and bounds lately.
It seems every one is building a RV. It must have something to do with
it being such a great airplane, although I am not bias at all. Three
years ago we decided to have a little laid back fly in. It was to "pay
back" our RV friends for hosting RV fly-ins that entertain us on
the weekends.
It was a success with many RVs flying in. I think we had 30 airplanes
fly in. (Patty
Hamilton in EAA 242 May newsletter)
Basic magneto theory
The magneto is basically a small AC generator constructed so that the
voltage wave produced reaches a peak at a certain rotation position.
When coupled to an engine crankshaft, this feature can be used to fire
a spark plug. By adding a breaker to it set to open just after the peak
voltage makes for a very rapid decay of the voltage, which causes a
very high voltage spark coil or auto transformer to be generated. (EAA
62 June newsletter)
Talking intercoms
Mark
Scheuer was returning to his roots. The Tennessee residents (now) had
just dropped his family off at the airport in Minneapolis for a return
flight, and drove to Lake Elmo Airport (21D) last Sunday to show me
his company's -- PS Engineering Incorporated -- latest product: the
PMA8000B. Mark was a resident of nearby Oakdale for many years, flew
out of 21D, and started his company with a fellow Hewlett Packard electrical
engineer in 1985.
It was too gusty
for any flying outside, so the local FBO had sent its staff home and
closed up shop, but left the door open. So we made ourselves at home
and explored some of the products features and how it might be of interest
to the RV community. The company's lower-end audio panel -- the PMA
4000 -- has found its way into many experimentals. It's a 4-place intercom
that can be configured for PTT with four unswitched inputs. It's suited
for a panel that's tight on space because of its 1.70" x 2.435"
x 6.50" size. I found it online for anywhere between $750 and $895.
But it was the PMA
8000-SR (it has a Sirius receiver) that Mark wanted to show off. It's
pricey -- about $2,600 for the SR, $1,700 for the 8000B without the
Sirius receiver -- with Mark stressing its ability to plug and play
in a swap out with the chief competition -- Garmin's GMA
340. A jack provides a way to connect a cell phone or IPod, and
digital recording so a pilot can replay the last recorded message (handy,
for those clearances.). Six "smart function" keys allow multiple
configuration of the panel to determine what the pilot, crew, and passengers
hear. For more, download
the pilot's guide (pdf). Worth checking out at OSH.
All of this got
us talking on the Yahoogroups RV Builder's List (formerly 7A group)
about features people want in an audio panel. Bret Smith of Georgia
had a proposal. "If you have their ear, propose the Jim Younkin
Model," he said. "Create an intercom for the Experimental
market. The intercom does not need a TSO for IFR certification. Make
it according to the specs I already mentioned but include stereo inputs
for the external (NOT integrated) XM/Sirius as well as DVD and IPOD,
i.e. COM 1/COM 2
NAV 1/NAV 2 Marker Beacon (4-5) Aux Inputs (Sat Radio, IPOD, Cell Phone,
CD/DVD Player, EIS annunciator, A/P annunciator, etc.) (3-4) stereo
inputs, stereo output. Keep the price point BELOW $1200! This would
be the ideal intercom for 98% of all experimental aircraft flying today.
Don't make us settle for the line of intercoms offered/designed for
the certificated crowd."
What's your plane's
intercom/audio solution, and how do you like it? Join the discussion
on the list and add your thoughts.
Related Links:
What's
new in avionics 2005 (pdf)
Thread:
Intercoms (RV Builders Group on Yahoo)
Archive
thread: intercoms - April 2005 (VAF)
The paperwork question
When RV builders
start their project, invariably the questions comes up: "how much
do I need to document?" This was a lot easier question when the
Internet wasn't stuffed full of RV construction Web sites, more detailed
and documented than even the instructions that Van's supplies. Their
existence suggests that maybe you should do the same thing. this is
the "records" version of the "I just gotta have that
Chelton."
Rob Riggens ExperCraft
is one site that makes detailed logs easier. In a discussion on the
RV
Builder's Forum on Yahoo, others proclaimed the tried and tree Excel
spreadsheet. Or just a loose-ring notebook with pictures. Personally,
I'm a fan of Kitlog
Pro, which makes assembling documentation on your own computer,
and keeping track of costs and maintenance pretty easy at a low price.
But, of course, my goal in keeping the log, is the same one as snapping
a picture at my son's graduation this week.
What's the FAA --
or DAR -- require? Here's what they say: (1) To meet the intent of §
21.191(g) and to be eligible for an experimental airworthiness
certificate, satisfactory evidence must be presented to show that the
aircraft was not built from completely prefabricated parts or kits.
However, the applicant cannot be expected to have personally fabricated
every part that makes up the aircraft any more than this can be expected
of a commercial aircraft manufacturer. Items such as engines and engine
accessories, propellers, rotor blades, rotor hubs, tires, wheel and
brake assemblies, instruments, and standard aircraft hardware such as
pulleys, bell cranks, rod ends, bearings, bolts, rivets, etc., may be
procured on the open market."
Clear as mud? That's
your cue. If you're not sure what the inspector will ultimately require,
pick up the phone and call the local FSDO, or talk directly to your
DAR. This is a point on which you should agree early in the process,
not a reason for battle when all you want to do is fly.
Cockpit
tour
Doug Weiler
of Hudson, Wisc., (featured last week in the Hotline), provides several
photographs of his throttle quadrant installation in his RV-4. Doug
is a 757 captain for Northwest Airlines, though I think he likes RVs
better. (See
slides on Flickr)